Georgia Hormones
  • Home
  • Our Practice
  • Dr. Robert P. Goldman
  • Donna Smyth, PA-C
  • Functional & Holistic Medicine
  • Women’s Hormone Health
  • Menopausal Health
  • Men’s Hormone Health
  • Case Studies
    • Abnormal Bleeding, Weight Gain
    • Aging, Mature Male
    • Early Menopause
    • Full Menopause
    • Underactive Thyroid
    • Young Male, Fatigued Adrenals
    • Teenage Acne, Irregular Cycles
  • Resources for Patients
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Compounding Pharmacies List
  • Testimonials
  • For Medical Professionals
  • FAQ
  • Forms
  • Blog
  • Location/Directions
  • Contact Us
404.814.9808 • fax: 404.814.6086 • [email protected]

It looks like the Susan G. Komen organization is losing ground. It’s about time.

7/18/2017

1 Comment

 
I received this email from founder, Annie Brandt, and wanted to share.  Dr. Robert Goldman  
Picture

Some Interesting News!
I ran across a very interesting piece of news recently that I want to share with you. The Susan G. Komen organization is pulling out of Arizona. Mary Budinger, an Advisory Board member who lives in Arizona, sent me two articles from the Arizona Republic newspaper which says SGK:
 
“will close in July because of dwindling donations and event participation … 7,500 people ran in the 2016 Race for the Cure, a number significantly lower than in previous years, which at one time saw upward of 30,000 participants.”
 
Lower participation and donations are attributed to the fact that Arizona’s weather permits many organizations to hold races and outdoor fundraising events. The executive director suggests there is simply too much competition.
 
Nice try, but there is much more to it than that. I’ll let Wikipedia hit some of the high points:
 
“In 2012, Komen's controversial attempt to withdraw funding for mammogram referrals provided by Planned Parenthood caused a significant decline in donations, event participation and public trust. The organization was further criticized for its use of donor funds, the CEO's 64% pay raise after the significant drop in donations, its administration costs, its choice of sponsor affiliations, its role in commercial cause marketing, and its use of misleading statistics in advertising. In March 2013, Komen dropped from Charity Navigator's highest rating of four stars down to three stars and then to two stars in 2014.”
 
I still remember when SGK slathered their pink on M&M candies and buckets of fried chicken—foods no cancer patient should touch—in return for sponsorship money. The organization chooses to beat the drum for annual mammograms, despite a mountain of evidence that they represent a poor early detection technology. Why not make the choice to promote some form of thermography? Why not wage a war on sugar, cancer’s favorite food? Why not come out against trans fats which we’ve known for decades to be carcinogenic? Why not give voice to the 2005 research by Environmental Working Group which detected 287 chemicals in umbilical cord blood, of which 180 are known to cause cancer in humans or animals? Or give voice to the more recent work of Dr. Thomas Seyfried? You get the idea.
 
Seems the American public is getting the same idea. 
 
SGK, founded in 1982, started out with a promise to find a cure for cancer. In 2016, SGK announced their “Bold Goal to reduce the current number of breast cancer deaths by 50% in the U.S. by 2026.” Given how they choose to operate, it is hard to imagine SGK could even make a small dent in the coming fatalities.  
 
It is my opinion that so many people have had cancer now, or known family members and friends who have had cancer, that they have glimpsed the harsh realities of the cancer industry’s machinery. And SGK, advocating for the status quo, is part of that machinery. Increasingly, the public is rejecting the status quo.
 
So to all of you on the front lines of innovative, integrative care—keep it up. The public is waking up and rejecting the status quo. Yes, many still fall for the mainstream marketing because getting the diagnosis of cancer can scare the living daylights out you. Having some good survival statistics for alternative therapies can help people look at the options that are available.

I strongly encourage all of you to participate in one of our clinical studies to get quotable survival stats for alternative medical therapies. Write me and I'll tell you how.

I also encourage us all to amplify our messaging and let people know good options exist.

Our efforts ARE making a difference! Change IS happening!

Thank you for all you do,
Annie 

 
[email protected]
bestanswerforcancer.org

Copyright © 2017 Best Answer for Cancer Foundation, All rights reserved.
1 Comment

    Robert P. Goldman, M.D.

    Dr. Robert P. Goldman provides guidance for female and male hormone balance, menopause management, holistic therapies and routine gynecological care.

    Archives

    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015

    Categories

    All
    Aging
    American Medicine
    Cancer
    Hair Loss
    Healthy Eating
    Menopausal Products
    Overdiagnosed
    Overtreated
    Testosterone
    Thyroid
    Vitamin Supplements

    RSS Feed

Home
Our Practice
Dr. Robert P. Goldman

Donna Smyth, PA-C
Functional Medicine
Women’s Hormone Health
Menopausal Health
Men’s Hormone Health

Case Studies
Testimonials
Resources for Patients

For Medical Professionals

FAQ
Forms
​Blog
Disclaimer
Privacy
Location/Directions

Contact Us
Sitemap

Copyright © 2022 Georgia Hormones, PC  •  All Rights Reserved
10220 Medlock Bridge Road  • Johns Creek, GA 30022
phone: 404.814.9808  •  fax: 404.814.6086  •  [email protected]